Psychology 9540
Research Design and Statistical Modeling
Instructor: Paul F. Tremblay, Ph.D.
email: ptrembla@uwo.ca
office hours: flexible; contact me by email to set appointment
Summary of online course structure:
Lectures: Asynchronous material consisting mainly of narrated video material with slides.
Weekly meetings: Weekly Zoom meetings to discuss bi-weekly lab assignments (schedule TBA).
Course work: Bi-weekly (12 in total) written assignments (90%); Submitting a weekly question or thought (10%).
Material: Suggested books and secondary journal articles and book chapters all available electronically through our Western library.
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
My personal objective in this course is to help you develop your skills, experience, and confidence to independently design and conduct research from start to finish. In order to reach that objective, I am convinced that we must concentrate on three pillars of research: research design, measurement, and statistical analysis. In his book, Becoming a Behavioral Science Researcher (2020), Professor Rex B. Kline from Concordia University refers to these three “pillars” as the trinity of research.
The course content consists of 24 topics organized into four general units:
• I. Fundamental and descriptive statistics (estimation, sampling distributions, data visualization and management, missing data techniques, inferential statistics, confidence intervals, effect size, replication, power analysis)
• II. General linear model and experimental designs with ANOVA, ANCOVA and MANOVA,
• III. Multiple Regression and Extensions (including mediation, moderation, multilevel modeling, and models for categorical outcomes such as logistic regression)
• IV. Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling with applications to measurement, test construction and construct validation.
The course work consists mostly of lab assignments that will provide hands-on training by having you generate hypotheses, analyze data, interpret and report results, conduct simulations, write mini research proposals, and evaluate published research. Students will have the flexibility to work with their preferred software. My course lectures and demonstrations include presentations in R (and the related jamovi and jasp applications with
easy to use graphic user interface), SPSS, and Mplus (for multilevel and structural equation modeling).
II. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Assignments: (90% of course grade).
• Background preparation for labs. Although I have never used formal tests or exams in this course, the lab assignments capture knowledge and ability to apply the content presented in the lectures. Students are responsible for keeping up with the weekly material.
• 12 bi-weekly assignments. The lecture schedule indicates when the assignments will be distributed, and you will have two weeks to complete an assignment. I will conduct weekly Zoom meetings with the class to explain the assignments and to answer questions.
• Most assignments will include data analysis, interpretation, discussion of results, and writing brief reports in APA style. A few assignments consist of developing mini research proposals and conducting power analyses or evaluating the procedures used in an article.
• Assignment reports will typically consist of a two double-spaced page write-up including a description, interpretation and discussion of your results, answers to specific questions, and an appendix with your analysis output.
• Late assignments will receive a 5% deduction per 24 hours. Assignments that are more than one week late will not be accepted for partial marks.
• Rules about working in groups. I am supportive of students working in groups to conduct the analyses and discuss the assignments. However, you are required to write your own report with no duplication from your colleagues’ work. The assignments will often require you to choose a subset of variables, to make decisions about plausible strategies, or to describe research ideas from your own area of interest. Also, some questions will ask you to design your own hypothetical research designs. As a result, it is unlikely that two students will work with the exact same material.
Weekly submission of a follow-up question or thought (10% of course grade).
We will use the Message feature in the course OWL site for you to submit to me a weekly question, thought, or comment about the previous lecture. I answer all these questions individually and often incorporate them as a follow-up in subsequent lectures.
III. LECTURE SCHEDULE
|
Date |
Topic |
Readings* |
Lab |
1 |
Sep 16 |
Overview |
Ch.1, K1, K2 |
|
2 |
Sep 23 |
Basic Statistics and Distributions - Visualization |
Ch. 2,3,4 |
A 1 |
3 |
Sep 30 |
Inferential Statistics – Simulation and Power analysis |
Ch. 5, 6, K3 |
|
4 |
Oct 7 |
Data Inspection and Missing Data Analysis |
K4, K9 |
A 2 |
5 |
Oct 14 |
t-tests and Effect Size |
Ch. 7, K5 |
|
6 |
Oct 21 |
One-way ANOVA |
Ch. 11, 9, 12, K6 |
A 3 |
7 |
Oct 28 |
Factorial ANOVA |
Ch. 13, K7 |
|
8 |
Nov 11 |
Repeated Measures and Trends |
Ch. 15 |
A 4 |
9 |
Nov 18 |
Split Plot ANOVA and Other Longitudinal Methods |
Ch. 15 |
|
10 |
Nov 25 |
Measures of Association (including Chi-Square) |
Ch. 8, 10 |
A 5 |
11 |
Dec 2 |
Introduction to Meta-Analysis |
See list |
|
12 |
Dec 9 |
Bivariate Linear Regression |
Ch. 17 |
A 6 |
13 |
Jan 13 |
Multiple Correlation – Understanding “Statistical Control” |
Ch. 18 |
|
14 |
Jan 20 |
Multiple Regression |
Ch. 18 |
A7 |
15 |
Jan 27 |
Categorical Predictors in Multiple Regression |
Ch. |
|
16 |
Feb 3 |
ANCOVA – Mix of Categorical and Continuous Predictors |
Ch. 14 |
A8 |
17 |
Feb 10 |
Moderation in Multiple Regression |
Ch. 20 |
|
18 |
Feb 24 |
Mediation in Multiple Regression |
Ch. 20 |
A9 |
19 |
Mar 3 |
Logistic Regression and Other Regression Models |
Ch. 19 |
|
20 |
Mar 10 |
Multilevel Modeling-I – Subjects Within Groups |
See list |
A10 |
21 |
Mar 17 |
Multilevel Modeling-II – Observations within Individuals |
See list |
|
22 |
Mar 24 |
Factor Analysis |
Ch. |
A11 |
23 |
Mar 31 |
Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Mod |
See list |
|
24 |
Apr 7 |
Measurement Theory (Classical and Item Response) |
K8 |
A12 |
|
||||
*Readings. Ch refers to Hahs-Vaughn & Lomax (2020); K refers to Kline (2020) |
IV. STATEMENT OF ACADEMIC OFFENCES
Scholastic offences are taken seriously and students are directed to read the appropriate policy, specifically, the definition of what constitutes a Scholastic Offence, at the following Web site: http://www.uwo.ca/univsec/pdf/academic_policies/appeals/scholastic_discipline_grad.pdf
All required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to the commercial plagiarism-detection software under license to the University for the detection of plagiarism. All papers submitted for such checking will be included as source documents in the reference database for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of papers subsequently submitted to the system. Use of the service is subject to the licensing agreement, currently between The University of Western Ontario and Turnitin.com (http://www.turnitin.com).
V. COURSE READINGS
I will use the two textbooks listed below throughout the course. These are available online through our Western library and can be accessed through the OWL course page. You will be able to download sections in pdf. (If you prefer your own hard copy, the books are available at amazon.ca).
Hahs-Vaunghn, D. L. & Lomax, R. G. (2020). An introduction to statistical concepts. Fourth Edition. Routledge. 978-1138650558
Kline, R. B. (2019). Becoming a Behavioral Science Researcher (Second edition). Guilford Press.
978-1462541287
A list of supplementary articles and book chapters (available electronically through library system or in the OWL course website) are listed below by lecture topic. These are additional resources that may serve you beyond this course in your own research. I will discuss most of these in my lecture material.
1. Overview
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., Rao, S. M., & Clinic, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
Morling, B., & Calin-Jageman, R. J. (2020). What psychology teachers should know about open science and the new statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 47, 169-179. doi: 10.1177/0098628320901372
Smith, E. R. (2014). Research design. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. 2nd edition. (p. 27–48). Cambridge University Press.
2. Basic Statistics and Distributions
Cumming G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye. Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.
American Psychologist, 60, 170-180. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170
DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
3. Inferential Statistics and Power analysis
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Retire statistical significance (Comment). Nature, 567, 305-307.
Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008). Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 537-563. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017). Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (published online). doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1
Hesterberg, T. C. (2015) What teachers should know about the bootstrap: resampling in the undergraduate statistics curriculum, The American Statistician, 69, 371-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2015.1089789
4. Data Inspection and Missing Data Analysis
Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
5. T-tests and Effect Sizes
Kelley, K., & Preacher, K. J., (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17, 137-152. doi: 10.1037/a0028086
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 259-269. doi: 10.1177/2515245918770963
6. One-way ANOVA
Sauder, D. C., & DeMars C. E. (2019). An Updated recommendation for multiple comparisons. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 26-44. doi:10.1177/2515245918808784
Smith, E. R. (2014). Research design. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. 2nd edition. (p. 27–48). Cambridge University Press.
7. Factorial ANOVA
Spinner, B., & Gabriel, R. M. (1981). Factorial analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies.
Canadian Psychology, 22, 260-270.
Pierce, C. A., Block, R. A., & Aguinis, H. (2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 916-924. doi: 10.1177/0013164404264848
8. Repeated Measures (Within subjects design)
Atkinson, G. (2001). Analysis of repeated measurements in physical therapy research. Physical Therapy in Sports, 2, 194-208. doi: 10.1054/ptsp.2001.0071
9. Split Plot ANOVA (a.k.a. Mixed ANOVA designs) and Overview of other Longitudinal Methods
Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., & DuToit, S. (2010). Advances in analysis of longitudinal data. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 79-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550
10. Measures of Association
de Winter, J. C. F., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2016). Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychological Methods, 21, 273-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000079
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
11. Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Cheung, M. W. L., & Vijayakumar, R. (2016). A guide to conducting a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 26, 121-128. doi: 10.1007/s11065-016-9319-z
Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Meta-analysis of research in social and personality psychology. In H.
T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd Ed., pp. 675-707). London: Cambridge University Press.
Schäfer T., & Schwarz, M. A. (2019). The Meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813
12. Bivariate Linear Regression
Lorenz, F. O. (1987). Teaching about influence in simple regression. Teaching Sociology, 15, 173-177. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1318032
13. Multiple Correlation – Understanding “Statistical Control”
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274-289. doi: 10.1177/1094428105278021
14. Multiple Regression
Hoyt, W. T., Leierer, S., & Millington, M. J. (2006). Analysis and interpretation of findings using multiple regression techniques. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 49, 223-233.
Hoyt, W. T., Imel, Z. E., & Chan, F. (2008). Multiple regression and correlation techniques: Recent controversies and best practices. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 321-339. doi: 10.1037/a0013021
Williams, M. N., Gomez Grajales, C. A., & Kurkiewicz, D. (2013). Assumptions of multiple regression. Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(11). Available online: https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=18&n=11.
15. Categorical Predictors in Multiple Regression
Wendorf, C. A. (2004). Primer on multiple regression coding: Common forms and the additional case of repeated contrasts. Understanding Statistics, 3, 47-57.
16. ANCOVA – Mix of Categorical and Continuous Predictors
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40-48. doi: 10.1037//0021-843X.110.1.40
17. Moderation in Multiple Regression
Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J., (2016). Regression based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
18. Mediation in Multiple Regression
Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J., (2016). Regression based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
19. Logistic Regression and Other Regression Models
Coxe, S., West, S. G., Aiken L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121-136. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634175
Huang, F. L., & Moon, T. R. (2013). What are the odds of that? A primer on understanding logistic regression. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 197-204. doi: 10.1177/0016986213490022
20. Multilevel Modeling-I – Subjects Within Groups
Huang, F. L. (2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 492-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000272
Nezlek, J. B. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 842-860.
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85-112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
21. Multilevel Modeling-II – Observations within Individuals
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85-112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., & DuToit, S. (2010). Advances in analysis of longitudinal data. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 79-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550
22. Factor Analysis
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.4.3.272
Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine.
Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43.
Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44, 219-246. doi: 10.1177/0095798418771807
23. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling
Weston, R. & Gore Jr, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719-751. doi: 10.1177/0011000006286345
Whitley, B. E., & Kite, M. E. (2018). Principles of Research in Behavioral Science. Fourth Edition. NY: Routledge. See chapter 12: Factor analysis, path analysis, and structural equation modeling.
24. Measurement Theory (Classical and Item Response)
DeVellis, R. F. (2006). Classical test theory. Medical Care, 44, S50 S59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41219505
Toland, M. D. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 120-151. doi: 10.1177/0272431613511332
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019, March 21). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626